This global marketplace was facing a difficult tradeoff: raise defenses and risk turning away real customers, or loosen controls and invite costly fraud. Pipl helped them break the tradeoff, improving approval rates, cutting chargebacks by more than two-thirds, and reducing operational burden in the process.
For this national retailer, a legacy rules engine had kept fraud tolerable but also untouchable. Changing anything risked breaking downstream workflows. But chargebacks were rising, review queues were growing, and leadership needed a way to unlock savings without disrupting operations.
Pipl Trust slotted in as a signal layer, not a replacement. With calibrated scoring thresholds, the team flagged high-risk users earlier, surfaced credible orders faster, and reduced fraud exposure without tuning a single rule.
The existing system hadn’t been recalibrated in years. Rules weren’t evolving, and manual overrides were the only way to catch what the engine missed.
Risky behaviors such as mismatched names, freight forwarding, and identity stitching slipped through if they didn't trip a specific threshold.
The system could say "this looks risky," but never "this looks good." Without a trust tier, every gray-area order landed in review, even when risk signals were low.
Instead of rewriting rules, the team added scoring logic that mapped cleanly to the decision paths they already trusted. Pipl calibrated risk and trust thresholds using historical orders, then validated them against known outcomes. High-risk users got flagged earlier, high-trust users got approved faster, and review queues thinned out without sacrificing precision. It worked because it fit their system, not because it replaced it.
more risk on name mismatches
less fraud on device-first sessions
more risk on email-phone mismatches
more approvals at 900+ scores
The goal wasn’t to reinvent the system. It was to make it sharper, smarter, and more efficient without introducing risk. With Pipl, the team saw measurable savings and workflow relief using only a scoring overlay.
Analysts were no longer stuck reviewing everything in the middle. Fraud was caught earlier, trust surfaced faster, and business impact was clear.
Fraud scoring identified high-risk orders that had previously gone unflagged, reducing loss without harming approvals.
Trust scoring sharply separated good and bad orders, improving downstream confidence and actionability.
Trust scoring surfaced good users earlier, enabling higher throughput without added exposure.