Skip to main content
Case-studies-Enterprise-Retail-Hero
Case Study

Lower chargebacks, fewer reviews

This global marketplace was facing a difficult tradeoff: raise defenses and risk turning away real customers, or loosen controls and invite costly fraud. Pipl helped them break the tradeoff, improving approval rates, cutting chargebacks by more than two-thirds, and reducing operational burden in the process.

The challenge

For this national retailer, a legacy rules engine had kept fraud tolerable but also untouchable. Changing anything risked breaking downstream workflows. But chargebacks were rising, review queues were growing, and leadership needed a way to unlock savings without disrupting operations.

Pipl Trust slotted in as a signal layer, not a replacement. With calibrated scoring thresholds, the team flagged high-risk users earlier, surfaced credible orders faster, and reduced fraud exposure without tuning a single rule.

Their goals were clear

The hard part wasn't naming them, it was hitting all four at once without one undermining the others:
decline-blk

Reduce chargebacks without tightening global fraud rules

manual-review-blk

Decrease manual review volume without increasing fraud

monitoring-blk

Improve visibility into borderline decisions

wallet-blk

Deliver measurable savings that earned internal trust

Where static systems broke down

A rules-only engine can hold the line for a while, but it can't keep up with fraud forever. By the time the team brought in Pipl, three problems were stacking up fast.
stop-blk

Rules frozen in place

The existing system hadn’t been recalibrated in years. Rules weren’t evolving, and manual overrides were the only way to catch what the engine missed.

warning-blk

Fraud was spreading through gaps

Risky behaviors such as mismatched names, freight forwarding, and identity stitching slipped through if they didn't trip a specific threshold.

deny-blk

No visibility into trust

The system could say "this looks risky," but never "this looks good." Without a trust tier, every gray-area order landed in review, even when risk signals were low.

How the system changed with Pipl

 

Instead of rewriting rules, the team added scoring logic that mapped cleanly to the decision paths they already trusted. Pipl calibrated risk and trust thresholds using historical orders, then validated them against known outcomes. High-risk users got flagged earlier, high-trust users got approved faster, and review queues thinned out without sacrificing precision. It worked because it fit their system, not because it replaced it.

Pipl's proof of signal intelligence

92%

more risk on name mismatches

80%

less fraud on device-first sessions

115%

more risk on email-phone mismatches

17x

more approvals at 900+ scores

The real win? Millions in revenue saves without changing a rule

The goal wasn’t to reinvent the system. It was to make it sharper, smarter, and more efficient without introducing risk. With Pipl, the team saw measurable savings and workflow relief using only a scoring overlay.

Analysts were no longer stuck reviewing everything in the middle. Fraud was caught earlier, trust surfaced faster, and business impact was clear.

 

$2.3 million in estimated chargeback reduction

Fraud scoring identified high-risk orders that had previously gone unflagged, reducing loss without harming approvals.

15.3% reduction in manual reviews

Borderline orders were reclassified with higher confidence, allowing the team to auto-approve or auto-deny without human intervention.

ROC-AUC reached 0.93

Trust scoring sharply separated good and bad orders, improving downstream confidence and actionability.

Approval rate increased by 3.6 percentage points

Trust scoring surfaced good users earlier, enabling higher throughput without added exposure.