Every flagship phone launch brings a rush of buyers, and fraudsters arrive with them. This global mobile provider needed to stop launch-driven fraud on in-store orders that often arrived without device or IP data. After layering a calibrated Pipl Trust Score into its existing rules, it prevented 480 fraudulent transactions and saved $450K in product in its first full month, while holding a 99.8% acceptance rate.
Every September, a new flagship phone launch drives a surge in demand, and fraudsters time their attacks to match. For this global mobile provider, each release meant a spike in manual reviews, more rejected orders, and added friction for legitimate customers.
The hardest orders to judge came through its retail flow, which covers every purchase completed in store. Those orders often arrive without device or IP data, the signals most fraud tools depend on.
The provider already knew Pipl. Pipl's commercial address indicator powered rules across 7 of its merchant accounts, and a proof of concept had extended Pipl to 6 more volume flows. To get ahead of the next launch, the team ran a custom Pipl Trust calibration on the retail flow in November 2025.
Launch season compresses a year of fraud pressure into a few weeks. The team set 4 goals for that window:
Launch fraud is predictable in timing and hard to separate from real demand. 3 conditions made it costly.
Fraudsters knew when demand would peak and timed their orders to blend in with a surge of legitimate buyers.
Retail purchases often lacked device and IP data, leaving fewer ways to tell a real customer from a fraudulent one.
Each launch brought more manual reviews and more rejected orders, adding friction for the customers the provider wanted to approve.
Pipl calibrated a Trust Score to the provider's retail flow, and the team layered it into the rules it already ran. Scores below 300 powered targeted reject rules. Where device and IP data were missing, identity signals carried the weight: how long an email had existed, what kind of phone line was on the order, whether the address was commercial, and whether names matched across email and address. Trust signals were also combined with the provider's existing fraud screening score to focus manual review on the orders that needed it.
more likely genuine when billing and IP locations matched and the phone had a long history
more fraud on mismatched billing and IP locations, new phone numbers, and high IP velocity
the average risk among transactions scoring below 300
Launch fraud follows the calendar, so the fix had to be in place before demand arrived. The calibrated Trust Score and Pipl's rule recommendations went live in November, ahead of the holiday peak. Since go-live, acceptance rates have risen and manual review rates have fallen. With 34 rules now using Trust, the provider goes into its next launch with targeted rules already running.
Orders stopped by Trust-powered reject rules during the launch and holiday period.
Fewer orders sent to analysts, with review focused on the cases that needed a second look.